The “elephant in the room.” A “red flag.” These are terms that a known financial expert used to describe Democrat vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris’ “lack of conversation” about global trade and international economics.
Not to cut to the chase too soon, but there’s a reason Princess Kamala wants nothing to with discussions about such things: I doubt that she could define international economic policy in any depth, much less intelligently explain the specifics about how she plans to approach the critical issue issue if she’s elected.
Perhaps even worse, her supporters couldn’t care less. Why? Because they hate Donald Trump more than they care about the stability of this country.
Bryan Kuderna, author of “What Should I Do With My Money?” told Fox that Harris’ refusal to talk about the issue, which affects virtually every American on both sides of the political divide, is a “red flag” (emphasis, mine).
There is a potential red flag there with Harris’s lack of conversation surrounding tariffs and really confronting China head on. She has been so quiet on any international economic theory, whether that’s to have tariffs, not to have tariffs, how we’re going to move forward the next four years in comparison to the other superpower, China, kind of the elephant in the room. She’s been very, very quiet on this.
Again, not tough to figure out. We’re talking about a woman who constantly spews nonsensical gibberish like:
You know what? Let me say something about this. We are here because we are fighting for a democracy. Fighting for a democracy. And understand the difference here, understand the difference here, moving forward, moving forward, understand the difference here.
Now, try to picture having a substantive conversation with Madam Vice President about the complicated intricacies of international trade and finance. Can’t do picture it? Me, neither. And neither can Kamala.
The huge red flag, as Kuderna accurately described it, is Harris’ focus on tax credits and government (taxpayer) giveaways rather than the global economy, which directly affects “all of the above.”
If we step back and say, well, let’s just kind of see how things unfold. Let’s focus on America and helping young professionals, helping first-time homebuyers, things of this nature, that’s all well and good. But meanwhile, if that allows China and their economy to really become a bit more dominant, that can have long-term consequences to our global standing as No. 1.
Bingo.
Silly word salads, unintelligible babbling, and hyena-like laughter — oh, and “joy” — won’t compete on the world economic stage. Does Harris care? I can’t say, but I do know that she cares more about pandering to disparate demographic groups, wealth redistribution, and her psychotic obsession with Trump than anything else.
Even Brian Albrecht, chief economist at the International Center for Law & Economics, admitted to Fox that Harris’ lack of focus is a serious issue moving forward.
[It is] a bit concerning that Harris has not brought out a more concrete plan about what she would do related to tariffs, international trade and immigration and things like that. But she’s in a hard spot. She needs to defend an administration which kept in basically every tariff that Trump put in.
Yep.
Yet when Harris parrots “we must turn the page” rhetoric ad nauseam, she points her finger Trump while excusing or ignoring the disastrous four years of the Biden-Harris administration.
The aggressive use of tariffs is an issue I’ll save for a different article, but the continued out-of-control importation of as many illegal aliens as the Democrats can get away with is no longer “good for our economy,” as Harris continues to mouth.
RELATED:
‘Fed Up With Being Exploited’: Voters in Key Demographic Group Could Very Well Doom Kamala Harris
“It’s clear to everyone that the economy is a major concern,” Albrecht said, adding: “Where we disagree is kind of what that means in practice and what to do about it going forward.”
The Bottom Line
The ugly little non-secret secret of Kamala Harris and the Democrat Party is this: They care far more about votes in the ballot box than the stability — and not just financially — than the well-being of America.
