Supreme Court rules against drivers in a case advocates say could make civil-rights claims harder

Date:

Share post:


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Tuesday that people who win early rulings in civil rights cases won’t necessarily be able to recover their legal fees, a finding that both conservative and liberal groups had argued could make it harder to fight for people’s rights in court.

The high court ruled 7-2 against Virginia drivers who sued after their licenses were suspended under a law they argued was unconstitutional. The drivers won an early court order blocking enforcement of the law, but then Virginia repealed the measure and the case ended before the judge reached a final determination.

Most of the time, each side pays its own legal costs in court. But plaintiffs who win civil rights cases can get the losing side to pay their legal fees under an exception to the law aimed at making it easier for people to press those claims in court.

Trusted news and daily delights, right in your inbox

See for yourself — The Yodel is the go-to source for daily news, entertainment and feel-good stories.

In the Virginia case, the state petitioned to the justices after an appeals court found it should pay the drivers’ attorneys’ fees. The state argued that because the drivers had won a preliminary injunction rather than a final court determination, it shouldn’t have to cover their legal fees.

Advocacy groups ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union to the Second Amendment-supporting Firearms Policy Coalition had weighed in on the side of the drivers. They said many cases are determined at the preliminary injunction stage and fewer people would be willing to challenge the government in court if they might have to bear the burden of potentially hefty legal fees even if they make a persuasive case.

But the Supreme Court found that winning at an early stage isn’t enough, since the outcome can change after a trial plaintiffs must win on the merits to recoup their legal fees.

The concern that governments could derail a case by changing a law if they lose at the preliminary injunction stage are only speculative, and apply to only a small number of cases, the majority found. The opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts, and joined by his five fellow conservatives as well as a liberal-leaning justice, Elena Kagan. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.



Source link

Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams is a writer and editor. Angeles. She writes about politics, art, and culture for LinkDaddy News.

Recent posts

Related articles

Judge gives Trump administration two days to release billions of dollars in blocked foreign aid

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Tuesday gave the Trump administration less than two days to...

White House seizes control of press pool, will decide which outlets cover events with president

The White House announced on Tuesday that the administration — not an independent group of journalists —...

Yosemite Staff Hang Upside-Down US Flag to Protest Terminations

Staff members at Yosemite National Park hung an upside-down US flag on the side of the El...

Mag 7 nears correction territory ahead of Nvidia earnings

The Magnificent Seven — the group of tech stocks comprised of Alphabet (GOOG,...

METRO unveils new initiative to tackle crime | CW39 Houston

HOUSTON (KIAH) — According to the office of Mayor Whitmire, METRO leaders are unveiling a plan to...

CEO resigns after video of him giving ‘Nazi salute’ at company event goes viral

A CEO resigned after appearing to gesture a Sieg Heil in front of a montage of President...

House Speaker Mike Johnson tries to push Trump's 'big' agenda forward, but GOP votes are in jeopardy

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Speaker Mike Johnson will try against the odds to muscle a Republican budget...

Murdered businessman's body found in sack in Kenya

The body of a murdered Scottish businessman was found in a sack by a Kenyan cattle herder...