Budget cuts to Mars Sample Return mission prompt hundreds of layoffs at JPL

Date:

Share post:



NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory will lay off hundreds of employees this week in anticipation of massive funding cuts in the next federal budget, JPL director Laurie Leshin told staff on Tuesday.

Despite pleas to NASA and the White House from California lawmakers anxious to preserve jobs at the La Cañada Flintridge research institution, the lab is letting go of 530 employees — approximately 8% of its workforce — and 40 additional contractors, Leshin said in a memo to staff.

“These cuts are among the most challenging that we have had to make even as we have sought to reduce our spending in recent months,” Leshin wrote. “As much as we wish we didn’t need to take this action, we must now move forward to protect against even deeper cuts later were we to wait.”

This is JPL’s second round of layoffs since the year began. In January, 100 on-site contractors lost their jobs after NASA directed the lab to reduce spending in anticipation of severe budget cuts for the Mars Sample Return mission, an ambitious effort managed by JPL that would bring pieces of the Red Planet back to Earth for study.

Though Congress has not yet finalized appropriations for next year, NASA has instructed JPL to prepare for a federal budget that could cap Mars Sample Return spending in the 2024 fiscal year at $300 million — 36% of the previous year’s $822-million budget allocation and less than one-third of the $949 million the Biden administration has requested for the program.

“To spend more than that amount, with no final legislation in place, would be unwise and spending money NASA does not have,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said in a statement.

JPL employees will learn whether they are losing their jobs on Wednesday. Most JPL employees have been instructed to work remotely “so everyone can be in a safe, comfortable environment on a stressful day,” Leshin wrote. “Most individuals will not be able to enter the Lab during this mandatory remote work day.”

California lawmakers in recent months have pleaded with NASA to preserve jobs at the agency, which currently employs about 6,000 people full-time.

Earlier this month, a bipartisan group of more than 20 members of California’s Congressional delegation sent a letter to the White House Office of Management and Budget protesting NASA’s “deeply misguided decision” to pre-emptively cut spending before appropriations were finalized.

“Make no mistake: these crushing job cuts are the direct result of the Administration’s premature decision to bypass Congressional spending authority and unilaterally slash vital funding for JPL’s Mars Sample Return mission,” Sen. Alex Padilla, a signatory to the letter, said in a statement. “These dramatic cuts are devastating for our local workforce and will set California and America’s scientific and space leadership back significantly at this critical moment.”

Rep. Judy Chu (D-Monterey Park) agreed that the job cuts will harm Southern California workers but expressed hope that they might be reversed. “I’m hopeful in the coming weeks we can work to broker a deal with the Administration and Congress to restore funding to the levels necessary to rehire workers,” she said in a statement.

The Mars Sample Return mission, a joint project with the European Space Agency, has been plagued with delays and cost overruns.

An independent review commissioned by NASA last year determined there was a “near zero probability” that the mission it would make its 2028 launch date.

The project is now on hold while NASA analyzes the review board’s findings. The team tasked with that review is scheduled to make its recommendations to NASA in March or April, Associate Administrator for Science Nicky Fox said last week during a public meeting of the agency’s Science Mission Directorate.



Source link

Lisa Holden
Lisa Holden
Lisa Holden is a news writer for LinkDaddy News. She writes health, sport, tech, and more. Some of her favorite topics include the latest trends in fitness and wellness, the best ways to use technology to improve your life, and the latest developments in medical research.

Recent posts

Related articles

You're gonna need a bigger number: Scientists consider a Category 6 for mega-hurricane era

In 1973, the National Hurricane Center introduced the Saffir-Simpson scale, a five-category rating system that classified...

Opinion: America's 'big glass' dominance hangs on the fate of two powerful new telescopes

More than 100 years ago, astronomer George Ellery Hale brought our two Pasadena institutions together...

Mosquito season is upon us. So why are Southern California officials releasing more of them?

Jennifer Castellon shook, tapped and blew on a box to shoo out more than 1,000 mosquitoes...

After months of silence, Voyager 1 has returned NASA's calls

For the last five months, it seemed very possible that a 46-year-old conversation had finally reached...

How L.A. County is trying to remake addiction treatment — no more 'business as usual'

Gary Horejsi wrestled with the decision before him, knowing a life could be in his hands.It...

FDA approves bladder cancer treatment by Culver City company

The Food and Drug Administration on Monday approved a new treatment for a type of bladder...

Taylor Swift's new album is rife with breakup songs. Psychologists explain why we love them

Perhaps never before have so many been so eager for something so steeped in heartbreak. Taylor...

Opinion: The decline in American life expectancy harms more than our health

American life expectancy started dropping even before the pandemic. It’s a critical barometer of our nation’s...