AI Chatbots Reflect Cultural Biases. Can They Become Tools to Alleviate Them?

Date:

Share post:


Jeremy Price was curious to see whether new AI chatbots including ChatGPT are biased around issues of race and class. So he devised an unusual experiment to find out.

apple 1623260071
spotify 1623260168

Price, who is an associate professor of technology, innovation, and pedagogy in urban education at Indiana University, went to three major chatbots — ChatGPT, Claude and Google Bard (now called Gemini) — and asked them to tell him a story about two people meeting and learning from each other, complete with details like the names of the people and the setting. Then he shared the stories with experts on race and class and asked them to code them for signs of bias.

He expected to find some, since the chatbots are trained on large volumes of data drawn from the internet, reflecting the demographics of our society.

“The data that’s fed into the chatbot and the way society says that learning is supposed to look like, it looks very white,” he says. “It is a mirror of our society.”

His bigger idea, though, is to experiment with building tools and strategies to help guide these chatbots to reduce bias based on race, class and gender. One possibility, he says, is to develop an additional chatbot that would look over an answer from, say, ChatGPT, before it is sent to a user to reconsider whether it contains bias.

“You can place another agent on its shoulder,” he says, “so as it’s generating the text, it’ll stop the language model and say, ‘OK, hold on a second. Is what you’re about to put out, is that biased? Is it going to be beneficial and helpful to the people you’re chatting with?’ And if the answer is yes, then it’ll continue to put it out. If the answer is no, then it will have to rework it so that it does.”

He hopes that such tools might help people become more aware of their own biases and try to counteract them.

And without such interventions, he worries that AI could reinforce or even heighten the problems.

“We should continue to use generative AI,” he argues. “But we have to be very careful and aware as we move forward with this.”

Hear the full story of Price’s work and his findings on this week’s EdSurge Podcast.

Listen to the episode on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or on the player below.



Source link

Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams is a writer and editor. Angeles. She writes about politics, art, and culture for LinkDaddy News.

Recent posts

Related articles

Scaling Evidence-Based Solutions for Learning Recovery

Since the pandemic, the urgency of designing and scaling evidence-based products to support learning recovery has become...

Do These Disappearing, 100-Year-Old Schools Hold a Vital Lesson for American Education?

Sometimes, it takes an unlikely friendship to change the world. For American education, one of those alliances...

How Is Axim Collaborative Spending $800 Million From the Sale of EdX?

One of the country’s richest nonprofits focused on online education has been giving out grants for more...

What Happens When a School Closes Its Library?

HOUSTON — On a Saturday morning in August 2023, a crowd gathered outside the Houston Independent School...

Effective Tech Integration Strategies: From District to Classroom

Integrating technology into the classroom involves more than just adding gadgets and software; it’s about creating a...

When Students Don’t Feel Confident About Math, a Growth Mindset Matters

Our relationship with math learning is severely damaged in this country. In 2022, only 26 percent of...

How a Returning College Student Advocated to Improve a Fledgling Online Program

Paul Carr was just one semester shy of finishing his degree at Morehouse College when he found...

To Be Ready for Kindergarten, Teachers and Researchers Say Social-Emotional Skills Are Key

Ready or not, across the country, a new crop of kindergarteners has entered the K-12 school system....