AI Chatbots Reflect Cultural Biases. Can They Become Tools to Alleviate Them?

Date:

Share post:


Jeremy Price was curious to see whether new AI chatbots including ChatGPT are biased around issues of race and class. So he devised an unusual experiment to find out.

apple 1623260071
spotify 1623260168

Price, who is an associate professor of technology, innovation, and pedagogy in urban education at Indiana University, went to three major chatbots — ChatGPT, Claude and Google Bard (now called Gemini) — and asked them to tell him a story about two people meeting and learning from each other, complete with details like the names of the people and the setting. Then he shared the stories with experts on race and class and asked them to code them for signs of bias.

He expected to find some, since the chatbots are trained on large volumes of data drawn from the internet, reflecting the demographics of our society.

“The data that’s fed into the chatbot and the way society says that learning is supposed to look like, it looks very white,” he says. “It is a mirror of our society.”

His bigger idea, though, is to experiment with building tools and strategies to help guide these chatbots to reduce bias based on race, class and gender. One possibility, he says, is to develop an additional chatbot that would look over an answer from, say, ChatGPT, before it is sent to a user to reconsider whether it contains bias.

“You can place another agent on its shoulder,” he says, “so as it’s generating the text, it’ll stop the language model and say, ‘OK, hold on a second. Is what you’re about to put out, is that biased? Is it going to be beneficial and helpful to the people you’re chatting with?’ And if the answer is yes, then it’ll continue to put it out. If the answer is no, then it will have to rework it so that it does.”

He hopes that such tools might help people become more aware of their own biases and try to counteract them.

And without such interventions, he worries that AI could reinforce or even heighten the problems.

“We should continue to use generative AI,” he argues. “But we have to be very careful and aware as we move forward with this.”

Hear the full story of Price’s work and his findings on this week’s EdSurge Podcast.

Listen to the episode on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or on the player below.



Source link

Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams is a writer and editor. Angeles. She writes about politics, art, and culture for LinkDaddy News.

Recent posts

Related articles

Should Instructors Ask Students to Show Document Histories to Guard Against AI Cheating?

‘Show your work’ has taken on a new meaning — and importance — in the age of...

How Are U.S. Students Doing in Math? About as Well as Their Parents Did in 1995

The results are in — and they’re not great. International data on math and science released earlier...

'Remember Your Why': How My Grandmothers Affirmed My Purpose as an Educator

One day, during a quiet afternoon in my classroom, a comment one of my colleagues said lingered...

Intergenerational Care Benefits Children and Seniors. Why Is It Still So Rare?

Several times a week, teachers at Tiny Images, an early learning program in Fairmont, Nebraska, load up...

Does School Choice Need a Lemon Law?

When she moved her daughter into a reputable private school in Washington at the beginning of the...

Anti-LGBTQ+ Policies Have a Direct Impact on Youth Mental Health. So Does Support.

Findings from a recent survey by the Trevor Project, a nonprofit focused on suicide prevention among LGBTQ+...

Why I Spend My Lunch Hour with Students

My favorite part of my job is not actually part of my job. As a public high...

Revisiting the Legacy of San Francisco’s Detracking Experiment

Even years later, San Francisco Unified School District casts a shadow over attempts to quash long-standing disparities...