Coalition announces FIRB overhaul

Date:

Share post:


The Coalition said its plan comes in response to a 6% decline in labour productivity since Labor took office, which has resulted in Australians working harder just to maintain their standard of living.

He warned that Australia is now among the worst productivity performers in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

“This is simply not good enough. Productivity and better government are essential to strong economic management. Without productivity, we cannot manage the economy well and will not sustainably beat inflation,” said Mr Taylor.

The Coalition wants to establish a taskforce to design a white list process for trusted investors from Quad (Australia, US, Japan and India), Five Eyes (Australia, US, UK, Canada and NZ) nations.

The goal is to streamline the FIRB approval process by reducing paperwork, processing delays, and unnecessary fees for investors with a clean track record.

“This is about smarter screening, not weaker oversight – a faster yes and a faster no – ensuring we focus resources where they are needed most while fast-tracking responsible investment,” Mr Taylor said.

“If you are an investor with a clean bill of health and a strong track record from a trusted partner nation, approvals will be faster, easier, and more predictable because investment certainty drives jobs, growth, and will lead to greater productivity gains.”

The Property Council of Australia welcomed the proposal, with Chief Executive Mike Zorbas stating that a whitelist would eliminate unnecessary red tape and make Australia a more attractive destination for global capital.

“Australia competes for global capital and institutional investors seeking stable, risk-adjusted returns,” Mr Zorbas said.

“While strong demographics and growth are advantages, complex, costly regulations and taxes make investment less competitive.

“We should welcome other people’s money to build the housing and infrastructure we need.”

He also emphasised that passive or non-controversial investments should not face unnecessary delays.

“Screening is important, and it is equally important that passive or non-controversial investment opportunities should not need to face an extended process that only adds to delay and cost for the end consumer,” he said.



Source link

Nicole Lambert
Nicole Lambert
Nicole Lamber is a news writer for LinkDaddy News. She writes about arts, entertainment, lifestyle, and home news. Nicole has been a journalist for years and loves to write about what's going on in the world.

Recent posts

Related articles

Start saving 5 hours per listing

In the fast-paced world of real estate, staying ahead of the competition is crucial. Enter @realty CRM,...

What makes a client say “Yes” when they’ve said “No” before 

“No” doesn’t always mean “no forever.”  In fact, it’s often the start of a new phase in the...

Sydney among world’s most expensive luxury property markets

Knight Frank’s Wealth Report 2025 found that the amount of prime real estate US$1 million (A$1.6 million)...

Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco purchase $35 million Beverly Hills estate

High-profile couple, Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco reportedly purchased the Beverly Hills property in December 2024, coinciding...

Hartford leads America’s hottest housing markets as buyers pay over asking

The city, which has ranked in the top 10 since April 2023, saw homes selling nearly twice...

Victoria strengthens renter rights with new laws

The changes, welcomed by Tenants Victoria, align with national efforts to provide greater security for renters, who...

Sally Patch: How to successfully launch a new agency

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 28:36 — 40.5MB) | EmbedSubscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify...

Transcending loss to leadership: stepping up from sales to CEO

In 2018, I lost my father. He was 57. Not long before this, my Mum passed. She...