Executives and researchers leading Meta’s AI efforts obsessed over beating OpenAI’s GPT-4 model while developing Llama 3, according to internal messages unsealed by a court on Tuesday in one of the company’s ongoing AI copyright cases, Kadrey v. Meta.
“Honestly… Our goal needs to be GPT-4,” said Meta’s VP of Generative AI, Ahmad Al-Dahle, in an October 2023 message to Meta researcher Hugo Touvron. “We have 64k GPUs coming! We need to learn how to build frontier and win this race.”
Though Meta releases open AI models, the company’s AI leaders were far more focused on beating competitors that don’t typically release their model’s weights, like Anthropic and OpenAI, and instead gate them behind an API. Meta’s execs and researchers held up Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s GPT-4 as a gold standard to work toward.
The French AI startup Mistral, one of the biggest open competitors to Meta, was mentioned several times in the internal messages, but the tone was dismissive.
“Mistral is peanuts for us,” Al-Dahle said in a message. “We should be able to do better,” he said later.
Tech companies are racing to upstage each other with cutting-edge AI models these days, but these court filings reveal just how competitive Meta’s AI leaders truly were — and seemingly still are. At several points in the message exchanges, Meta’s AI leads talked about how they were “very aggressive” in obtaining the right data to train Llama; at one point, an exec even said that “Llama 3 is literally all I care about,” in a message to coworkers.
Prosecutors in this case allege that Meta’s executives occasionally cut corners in their mad race to shipping AI models, training on copyrighted books in the process.
Touvron noted in a message that the mix of datasets used for Llama 2 “was bad,” and talked about how Meta could use a better mix of data sources to improve Llama 3. Touvron and Al-Dahle then talked about clearing the path to use the LibGen dataset, which contains copyrighted works from Cengage Learning, Macmillan Learning, McGraw Hill, and Pearson Education.
“Do we have the right datasets in there[?]” said Al-Dahle. “Is there anything you wanted to use but couldn’t for some stupid reason?”
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has previously said he’s trying to close the performance gap between Llama’s AI models and closed models from OpenAI, Google, and others. The internal messages reveal the intense pressure within the company to do so.
“This year, Llama 3 is competitive with the most advanced models and leading in some areas,” said Zuckerberg in a letter from July 2024. “Starting next year, we expect future Llama models to become the most advanced in the industry.”
When Meta ultimately released Llama 3 in April 2024, the open AI model was competitive with leading closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic, and outperformed open options from Mistral. However, the data Meta used to train its models — data Zuckerberg reportedly gave the green light to use, despite its copyright status — are facing scrutiny in several ongoing lawsuits.