When it rains, it pours. That’s how the old saying goes, and for Kamala Harris’ sinking presidential campaign, the old adage is holding true. It was a shock to the system: the Teamsters Union declined to endorse Democrat appointee nominee Kamala Harris in early October.
But this stunner was soon followed up by the Firefighters Union taking the same stance, followed by investment guru Warren Buffett and two far-left “journalism” outlets, the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post.
If you saw this coming, please send me stock tips.
But the Kamala carnage is not over: on Monday, Gannett-owned USA Today announced they’re not publicly backing the unintelligible vice president either:
USA Today has announced that it, too, is choosing not to endorse any candidate in the 2024 presidential race, following other high-profile newspapers like The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times.
“While USA TODAY will not endorse for president, local editors at publications across the USA TODAY Network have the discretion to endorse at a state or local level,” USA Today spokesperson Lark-Marie Antón told Fox News Digital.
#BREAKING: USA Today has announced they are REFUSING to endorse a candidate for President
Kamala becoming too toxic, even for them. pic.twitter.com/CUcCLoFqnk
— Daniel Mirkin #MAGA CEO of Trade Ideas (@TradeIdeas) October 29, 2024
I wanna knooow, who’ll stop the rain: The Hits Just Keep Coming: Legendary Billionaire Financier Won’t Back Kamala Despite His Past Dem Support
Democrats Have Gotten This Big Endorsement for Nearly 40 Years; Kamala Just Lost It
Teamsters Members Overwhelmingly Voted to Endorse Trump, But Leadership Wimped Out
Like so many lately, USA Today is throwing out the now-familiar excuses, but one can’t help but wonder: wasn’t this all true before? Why is it only now that Kamala Harris’ campaign is tanking that you’ve suddenly found these new ethical guidelines and ground rules?
USA Today:
“Why are we doing this? Because we believe America’s future is decided locally – one race at a time. And with more than 200 publications across the nation, our public service is to provide readers with the facts that matter and the trusted information they need to make informed decisions,” the spokesperson added.
And you suddenly realized that… one week before the election?!
Why was it different in 2020? Jeff Bezos Weighs in on WaPo Endorsement Drama: ‘Our Profession Is Now the Least Trusted of All’
USA Today refusing to endorse a candidate is wild. Just say you’re voting for Trump, it’s okay, we will accept you. pic.twitter.com/3i9R2DramO
— Jessie (@JessieKx3) October 28, 2024
Fleeing for the exits: Requiem for a Rag: The LA Times Implodes Over the ‘Non-Endorsement’ of Harris
Why the Washington Post Won’t Endorse Kamala Harris, and Why the Left Is Big Mad About It
Holy smokes, it’s an epidemic.
First it was the Teamsters, then the Firefighters union.
Then the LA Times, Washington Post, and now USA Today.
ALL NOT ENDORSING KAMALA HARRIS. https://t.co/TZlfQO9wRG
— Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) October 28, 2024
There really is only one way we can describe what’s happening to Kamala Harris. The Walz are closing in.
Sorry, I had to do that.
2017: “The walls are closing in!”
2018: “The walls are closing in!”
2019: “The walls are closing in!”
2020: “The walls are closing in!”
2021: “The walls are closing in!”
2022: “The walls are closing in!”
2023: “The walls are closing in!”
…
2028: “The walls are closing in!” pic.twitter.com/L0OhcLqIcD— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 7, 2023
