Follow live coverage of the 2024 Wimbledon men’s final and mixed doubles final here
WIMBLEDON — Carlos Alcaraz beat Novak Djokovic in the Wimbledon final at the All England Club 6-2, 6-2, 7-6 on Sunday.
The No 3 seed prevailed over the No 2 seed in a one-sided victory, ultimately decided by Djokovic’s hampered movement after knee surgery, Alcaraz’s massively improved serve, and his psychological edge over Djokovic in net exchanges.
It is Alcaraz’s second Wimbledon title and his fourth Grand Slam singles title. He becomes only the sixth men’s player to complete the French Open and Wimbledon double in the same year, after Djokovic, Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Bjorn Borg, and Rod Laver. He completed the ‘Surface Slam‘, winning on grass, clay and hard courts, by beating Alexander Zverev in the French Open final at Roland Garros in June.
It was Djokovic’s first straight-sets defeat at Wimbledon since the 2013 final, when he lost to Andy Murray.
The Athletic’s writers, Charlie Eccleshare and Matt Futterman, analyze the final and what it means for tennis.
How much can a first game mean?
Notes from the first game of a final match.
It lasted 12 minutes. There were seven deuces. Djokovic seemed like he had to hit 50 serves. A sound emanated from his lungs after each one, more moan or groan than intimidating grunt. It was too hard, too early.
At the seven-minute mark, Alcaraz unleashed his first outrageous shot of the day, a scorching forehand down the line, with Djokovic rushing the net. Djokovic didn’t even bother turning his head. Long ago, Alcaraz said when he can land his forehand down the line early he knows he’s feeling his game. Everyone in the locker room knows to beware of this — Djokovic most of all.
Back and forth they go. Djokovic digs in to find a big serve or two to save a break point, then gives himself an advantage point — but he can’t convert.
Another deuce. Another serve down the middle, and Alcaraz rolls a backhand crosscourt on a second serve return that almost stings as much as the forehand from before. It’s just a little early for a game this intense, and for shots like this. As Djokovic sets up to serve, his chest rises and falls with each breath.
He earns a reprieve, but on the next point, he’s coming forward, trying to catch up to a dipping backhand volley before the ball drops below the top of the net. He’s half a step slow. The ball hits the mesh.
More pressure. Another break-point chance. A big serve sets up an easy forehand into the open court, especially for a player who has won 24 Grand Slam titles. A big breath.
Contact.
It sails wide.
It’s 1-0 Alcaraz, and it really shouldn’t matter, because first games don’t matter in five-set tennis matches, and with Djokovic, first sets barely matter either. But this game feels like it does, not just because it was hard — really hard — but because it was so much harder than so many of his first games in his 36 other Grand Slam finals. That number, ridiculous as it seems, is not wrong.
It was a fitting start to a very hard afternoon.
Matt Futterman
The art of playing an injured player?
One of tennis’ most difficult psychological tests is playing a match against an ailing opponent. That’s any match, against any ailing opponent — let alone a Wimbledon final against a 24-time Grand Slam champion.
Just a few games in, it was clear that Djokovic was far from full fitness — hardly a surprise just over five weeks after meniscus surgery. While a half-fit Djokovic can still take care of most of the field on grass, Alcaraz is not most of the field.
GO DEEPER
‘I didn’t know if I could play’ – Why Wimbledon’s biggest subplot is injuries
Djokovic also played his hand early, frequently rushing to the net in the opening few games. It was partly tactical, an attempt to take advantage of his excellent spot serving, but it also suggested that he didn’t fully trust his ability to win a baseline match against Alcaraz. An advantage for the Spaniard? In theory. But, as much as Alcaraz brings freewheeling spontaneity and shotmaking, tennis is a sport of plans and reverting from those patterns is much trickier than it looks — but Alcaraz took full advantage of an opponent whose movement is compromised.
Alcaraz ultimately gave an exhibition on how to cope with an opponent not at 100 per cent.
He didn’t massively change his approach, or start indiscriminately chucking in drop shots. He played attacking, percentage tennis, taking advantage of the holes in Djokovic’s game created by his knee. When Djokovic was at the net, he hit a passing shot that was good enough, not painting the lines. He dipped the ball low onto Djokovic’s shoelaces, often with a slice out of the backhand corner, asking him to try and get low and dig volleys up, or hold his wrist steady enough to chip the ball over the net just above the tape. Again and again, Djokovic missed.
At one point in the second set, Alcaraz hit an inside-out forehand into the corner with so much shape that it was almost a lob, with so little speed that it teased Djokovic as it gently puttered past. Naturally, there were some spectacular shots in all of this — including four in a game at 4-4 in the third for a crucial break — but predominantly, this was a performance of controlled aggression. It demonstrated the exceptional maturity of this 21-year-old.
Charlie Eccleshare
Did Djokovic need Alex de Minaur more than anything?
So much had to go right for Djokovic to even get a chance to play Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final 39 days after undergoing surgery on the meniscus in his right knee.
Ultimately, it might have gone too right.
Doctors had to be able to fix the tear by excising it rather than repairing it. It meant Djokovic could move seamlessly through his rehabilitation, progressing every day from walking and hopping to running to shifting direction without any swelling, pain or inflammation.
GO DEEPER
Inside Novak Djokovic’s recovery – accepting outsiders, hyperbaric chambers, Jelena’s worries
Then he had to play himself back into shape, first with practice sets against Frances Tiafoe and Daniil Medvedev and then, if he could get lucky, against some soft early-round opponents.
He got lucky, not just by drawing a qualifier and a wild card in the first two rounds, but by seeing Alcaraz land on the other side of the draw along with world No 1 Jannik Sinner.
Then he had to play Australian Alexei Popyrin, who had little Centre Court experience, and a formless Holger Rune.
His next opponent posed what appeared to be a formidable test — Alex de Minaur, another Aussie, a lover of grass and, most importantly, a top-10 player with the wheels and the engine to run all day. De Minaur was even showing some newly acquired power, to hang with Djokovic when he revs through the gears.
But De Minaur tore his hip cartilage in the final three points of his fourth-round win over Arthur Fils.
He pulled out, leaving Djokovic with more rest and world No 25 Lorenzo Musetti to beat in the semifinal. Djokovic had a plan for Musetti and executed it ruthlessly, taking just three sets to dispatch the Italian.
Then came Alcaraz, a player everyone in the game describes as five steps up in toughness. “Against Carlos, it’s a different intensity,” Alexander Zverev said after Alcaraz had driven him to cramps in the French Open final. It was different on Sunday for Djokovic too. By the time he had raised his level to where it needed to be to hang with Alcaraz, Djokovic was down two sets.
So much different. Too different. Everything had gone right — when he just needed a little on-court adversity to be ready for this ultimate test.
Matt Futterman
How did Alcaraz meet the moment with his serve?
It was fitting that Alcaraz served out this match in a tiebreak because the game in which he botched serving for the match was a complete aberration in an otherwise masterful serving performance.
Alcaraz came into this match with a first-serve-points won percentage of 72 for the Championships, the 68th-best in the men’s event. Serving had been a real issue, having been broken multiple times in his six matches before the final.
On Sunday, he produced his best serving performance of the tournament, maximising the risk-reward ratio on his first-serve. He made fewer than his tournament average, but significantly increased his percentage of points won behind them.
Alcaraz was just a point away from registering only the third completed Grand Slam tournament match in which Djokovic could not break his opponent’s serve, and giving up just a single break to such a devastating returner underlined the serving rhythm he found. When he was under pressure at other times, such as in the sixth game of the third set and facing break point, he came up with a couple of unreturnable first serves to steady himself and ultimately dig out the hold.
Alcaraz kept his speeds high, but crucially he kept hitting his spots too, and was brave with his second serves.
There was one second serve at the start of the third set to get him out of a tight game that landed plum on the line and completely bamboozled Djokovic. On many occasions this tournament, it had felt like Alcaraz had done everything well apart from the relatively prosaic act of serving. In Sunday’s final, Wimbledon got a glimpse of how irresistible he is when this area of his game clicks.
Charlie Eccleshare
What did Carlos Alcaraz say after the final?
On court:
“When I was 11 or 12 years old, I said my dream was to win Wimbledon, so I’m repaying my dream. Obviously it’s a great feeling to play on this beautiful court and lift this massive trophy,” he said.
“It seemed so far away, Djokovic is an unbelievable fighter. I knew he would have chances again, so I tried to stay there. It was difficult for me, I tried to stay calm and stay positive going into the tiebreak.
“I tried to play my best tennis, that’s all I was thinking about. I’m glad I was able to find solutions. I’m really happy to be in this situation and obviously play a great tiebreak.”
Asked about the Euro 2024 final, in which Spain play England, he said, “I don’t know where but I will watch it for sure.
“I’ve already done my job, so let’s see the football! It’s going to be a really difficult match.”
What did Novak Djokovic say after the final?
On court:
“He was definitely very hot today! Yes, obviously not the result I wanted, especially in the first couple of sets, my level of tennis wasn’t up to par.
“From the back of the court, serve, he had it all today. I tried to push him, save the three match points, and extended the match a little bit, but it wasn’t meant to be, really.”
When asked about his path to the final after surgery, he said, “I have to be very proud. Obviously there’s a bit of disappointment right now, 10 minutes after the match finished, but when I reflect on the last couple of weeks, and what I’ve been through…
“I have to say I’m very satisfied because Wimbledon has always been a childhood dream tournament of mine and I always wanted to be here and play on centre stage.
“I try to remind myself of how surreal the feeling is of being here.”
Recommended reading
(Top photo: Getty Images)