Legal experts: Judge Cannon risks “recusal” as Trump asks to bring docs back to “scene of the crime”


Share post:

Donald Trump Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

Donald Trump Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump on Wednesday asked the judge overseeing his classified documents case to reestablish his Mar-a-Lago resort as a “secure facility” where he can discuss classified discovery evidence in the case.

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team requested a protective order that would require Trump to only review and discuss classified evidence in one of several highly secure locations run by Florida’s federal courts. Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday asked Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump appointee handling his case, to instead allow him to review and discuss the classified evidence at “a previously approved facility at or near his residence,” an apparent reference to Mar-a-Lago, according to The New York Times.

Trump attorney Christopher Kise told the judge that re-establishing “the same secure area” would reduce the “immense practical and logistical hurdles and costs” of having Trump travel to one of the sensitive compartmented information facilities, or SCIFs, which are run by the courts.

“Efforts to safely transport and protect President Trump—all of which are required by the Secret Service—cost the United States government and state and local municipalities hundreds of thousands of dollars per visit, which is significantly more than the fixed amount necessary to re-establish the secure area at which President Trump (and his lawyers) were once permitted to discuss classified information,” the filing said.

Smith’s team last month argued in favor of the SCIFs last month.

“The government is not aware of any case in which a defendant has been permitted to discuss classified information in a private residence, and such exceptional treatment would not be consistent with the law,” prosecutors said in a July filing.

Trump’s lawyers called the argument “misleading” because of the “uniqueness of President Trump’s residence, including that it is in a highly protected location guarded by federal agents that previously housed a secure facility approved for not only the discussion, but also the retention, of classified information.”

But the attorneys also acknowledged that the facility was “decertified” in 2021 before Trump was charged with illegally stashing over 100 classified documents at his residence and obstructing government efforts to recover them. Trump pleaded not guilty.

Legal experts expressed alarm over the request.

“This ask by Trump is not only unusual, but basically asks Judge Cannon to make the literal scene of the crime into a SCIF,” tweeted MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang, adding that the “bathrooms at Mar-a-Lago are not SCIFs,” a reference to photos in Trump’s indictment showing boxes of materials taken from the White House stored in one the resort’s restrooms.

National security attorney Mark Zaid called it a “ridiculous request.”

“No way [the government] would agree to provide Trump with lawful method to store or review classified info at location that remains [a] threat, not to mention risks he poses,” he tweeted. “And it’s not inexpensive to build SCIF. Has Trump even offered to pay for costs?”

Brandon Van Grack, a former DOJ national security official and member of former special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, said that it would be “unprecedented” if Cannon granted the request, noting that it does not appear that Trump’s lawyers had discussed the feasibility with a classified information security officer.

“What authority would Cannon possibly have to order the government to establish a SCIF anywhere?” questioned former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega. “A US District Court Judge has no authority to do that.”

“The DOJ should oppose this based on [Trump’s] track record of complete dereliction with respect to security procedures at Mar-a-Lago,” added former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman. “If Cannon approves it notwithstanding, that record, I think it makes a strong case for recusal.”

Read more

about Judge Aileen Cannon

Source link

Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams is a writer and editor. Angeles. She writes about politics, art, and culture for LinkDaddy News.

Recent posts

Related articles

WHOOPS! GOP Lawmaker Accidentally Burns Trump With 'Freudian Slip' For The Ages

A certain former president might not be too happy with this one.Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) on Thursday...

Philippines defending territory, not seeking trouble in South China Sea – president

MANILA (Reuters) - The Philippines will put up a strong defence of its territory and the rights...

Say What?!? Jeanine Pirro Blurts Out Most Bizarre Impeachment Analysis Yet

Fox News host Jeanine Pirro raised eyebrows on social media with an accidental double entendre after Thursday’s...

House GOP passes Pentagon funding bill after failed tries

House Republicans late Thursday night approved legislation to fund the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2024,...

Florida 3-year-old shoots herself in hand with loaded gun while relative is glued to football game: video

An in-home security camera captured the shocking moment a 3-year-old in Florida wandered over to a loaded...

MAGA Hat Gunman Opens Fire at Rally Over Conquistador Statue: Reports

A suspect is in custody after a shooting broke out at a protest in New Mexico over...

400-pound ‘gentle giant’ pulled from waters off New York. Check out the massive catch

Wildlife officials pulled up a behemoth catch while surveying waters between Connecticut and Long Island, New York,...

Florida teacher, Disney employees among 219 arrested in human trafficking operation: authorities

A Polk County, Florida, human trafficking operation earlier this month led to the arrests of 219 people,...