Reagan-appointed judge uses footnote to ding the Supreme Court’s Trump immunity ruling

Date:

Share post:


A federal trial court judge in North Carolina used a highly unusual footnote in a ruling Friday to take a swipe at the Supreme Court, accusing the conservative majority of attempting to “redesign” the presidency when it granted sweeping immunity to Donald Trump.

In a lengthy footnote at the end of his opinion, US District Judge William G. Young, appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1985, appeared to praise the high court’s rulings this year affirming the use of jury trials in some situations.

But then Young offered a caveat, citing the court’s major decision in the Trump immunity case delivered along 6-3 conservative-liberal lines.

Young described the outcome of that case as a “six-member majority, eschewing historical analysis,” that “sought fundamentally to redesign the relationship between the sovereign people and the first citizen of the Republic.”

The Supreme Court on July 1 ruled that Trump may claim immunity from criminal prosecution for some of the official actions he took to overturn the 2020 election. Special counsel Jack Smith’s case against Trump is now pending in a US District Court in Washington, DC, and the next hearing won’t be until September.

The court’s decision has drawn sharp criticism from the left, including President Joe Biden and many Democrats on Capitol Hill. Unlike with other historic cases entwined with presidential politics, the court failed to find any compromise between the justices nominated by Republican presidents and those picked by Democrats.

Young, who in 2021 assumed senior status – a form of semi-retirement for judges – normally sits in Massachusetts. He was brought in to handle the case in North Carolina because it involved claims of sexual harassment against judicial officials there.

In the footnote at the end of his opinion, Young praised the attorneys involved in the case and encouraged “each of you to continue in trial work.” Young wrote that the federal judiciary appeared to be at a “hinge moment where we need every trial attorney we can get.”

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com



Source link

Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams
Alexandra Williams is a writer and editor. Angeles. She writes about politics, art, and culture for LinkDaddy News.

Recent posts

Related articles

Philippine VP says she would have Marcos assassinated if she is killed

By Neil Jerome MoralesMANILA (Reuters) - Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte said on Saturday she would have...

Susan Smith furious at parole denial, 30 years after killing kids: Insider | Banfield

Three decades after Susan Smith strapped her two young sons into their car seats and let the...

Prince George’s County Police Department officer fired after viral video shows him kissing woman in uniform, according to Washington Post

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Md. (DC News Now) — A member of the Prince George’s County Police Department...

N.H. man critically burned at work remains in ICU as community lends support

A New Hampshire man who suffered critical burns on the job remains in a Boston hospital as...

US judge rejects SEC bid to sanction Elon Musk

By Jonathan Stempel(Reuters) -A federal judge on Friday rejected the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's request to...

Pregnant student allegedly told by Georgetown Law she must take exam days after giving birth

A pregnant student at Georgetown University has allegedly been told by the prestigious university’s administration she must...

Multiple crashes on Interstate 430 bridge bringing traffic to a crawl

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Multiple crashes on the Interstate 430 bridge in Pulaski County are bringing Friday...

Texas Supreme Court overturns ruling that state Attorney General Ken Paxton testify in lawsuit

The Texas Supreme Court on Friday overturned a lower court ruling that state Attorney General Ken Paxton...